Best defense is to create a set-up, bribe cheat and lie and use the court to get the smokescreen/diversion going to cover up the collusion
Joe Burke Esq is a small-time corrupt lawyer engaged in extortion, bribery, secretion of evidence, perjury, covering up John Siebert's thefts, tax evasion, sex molesting of many patients, thefts of lien medicare funds and thefts of empire BC/BS insurance proceeds by forgery and filing false insurance forms. Joe Burke has conspired with bad-egg court referee Jack Suter to rob Jim Couri. From may 2008 Burke engaged in a series of ex parte emailing with corrupt Suter geared to set Jim up. In or about Sept 2008, Suter and Burke conspired on emails to create a illegal order, written by Burke for Suter giving to Burke and Siebert $7million. An order they actually filed, fraud and collusion and criminal. Jim's assistant heard of the phony order and Jim, from hospital in California, was able to make a hand written motion to get the swindle expunged. JSC Stallman knew the scam went to far and Suter resigned, Jim demanded that Stallman refer these crimes to law enforcement but Stallman vacillated. A cover-up for Stallman's pal rogue referee Suter.
NOW THE SET-UP, DESPICABLY WITH THE HELP OF A SHADY CORRUPT COURT DESPERATE TO ROB AND GAG JIM WHO IS TERMINALLY ILL. WHILE COVERING UP THE COLLUSION, TAMPERING AND FRAUDS OF BURKE/SIEBERT/GOMEZ/PAVIA AND CULPRITS AT THE COURTHOUSE.
Tthese outlaws needed a new scapegoat to get the heat off Suter, Burke and Stallman. Enter again, resourceful, corrupt Joe Burke, first in Oct-Nov 2008 these crooks using Burke's partner-front Kenneth Gomez Esq robbed Jim's medical malpractice settlement, a swindle orchestrated in another courtroom in the unified courthouse in NY. Gomez/Burke/Siebert/Pavia, with the help of a corrupt and fixed court made a 30 fold score in a few weeks, robbing Jim and medicare. Well, this was not enough these crooks needed a set up, a plant to discredit Jim, who had uncovered the many unified courthouse corruption fixes and cronyism involving referees the appellate division, and numerous trickster judges. They had to make Jim look bad so that these crooks could railroad Jim and cover up the courthouse larceny. Resourceful Burke and Gomez found a willing victim. In Nov-Dec 2008 a drug abusing desperate notary Jim was using in Los Angeles who worked in the mail-room of global business center in Beverly Hills ca -until this woman was fired- where Jim maintained an office while undergoing medical care and many surgeries. This notary was desperate for money and was observed smoking 'pot' at Global's offices. Well, Burke got to this woman after Jim caught Burke engaging in crimes with referee Suter, ie fall of 2008. The notary apparently doing Burke's 'bidding' and on Burke/Gomez instructions, then conned Jim and sold him -for over $250- a number of her notaries with her stamp and a signature affixed to the pages, but each signed by Jim in her presence. The con? Jim was going into hospital for surgery and this notary said that this proposition would avoid the need for seeking notary from a hospital bed, little did Jim know was that Burke/Gomez and others were part of this set-up scam using the notary to con Jim under the guise of 'friendship and helping'. When Jim thereafter used these notaries on his own truthful affidavits, Burke/Siebert/Stallman struck and accused Jim of forgery, with an affidavit in support from this drug abusing notary and exhibiting this notaries forged notary-book. What would Jim have to gain by supposed forgery of an LA notary stamp and signature on his own affidavits? In L.A. there are hundreds of notaries. The con and the accusation/ premise is absurd and a transparent 'set-up' to take the heat off Burke/Suter/Stallmam and others in the unified courthouse and Jim proving the rampant corruption, so Burke, with the aid of a corrupt court, thinks he has covered up his documented crimes of collusion and corrupting referee Suter, perjury, secretion of evidence and bribery by setting up Jim with a sham absurd story.
Most revealing -the claim is so absurd- but the Unified Court ignores the documented collusion of Burke and Suter, contempt, perjury and worse engaged in by Siebert/Burke and harasses Jim for these phony claims regarding his own moot affidavits. That were part of motions made that were in any event filed in violation of a injunction an thus all improper and have been dismissed as neither Siebert/Burke or Jim complied with the preconditions of the injunction. Thus Burke/Siebert/Gomez got to a desperate LA drug abusing notary to try and set Jim up.
The scam? Claiming Jim forged the woman's notary to Jims own affidavits, while notaries are as available as ants in LA and on affidavits that were a part of motions that were improper and that have been dismissed, in fact Jim complied with California law as he signed all notaries he bought and paid for in front of this scoundrel-notary and signed her notary book. Scamraiders has learned that this notary has been censured by California notary department for notary violations and this mail-room notary was fired from global business for we believe incompetence, not showing up for work and others observing the notary's misuse of 'pot' at the offices of global. Another series of acts of corruption, fraud and larceny to rob Jim of his rights and money by collusion, greed an acts of criminality.
Enter JSC Paul Wooten, true to form, a company man. He cherry-picks motions, dismisses Jim's, ignores Siebert/Burke's that did not comply with the mandates of the injunction. Which include virtually all motions made since 12-12-05 the day the injunction was issued. Undaunted, Wooten tries to railroad Jim over interstate phone lines in a court proceeding, lies and tries to fool and make Jim a 'skapegoat', then Wooten, in contravention to his own decisions, does not dismiss and vacate all motions and decisions that violated the injunction, including decisions involving the scam-set up regarding the notary and Jim's own truthful affidavits that are moot as the motions they support/oppose were flawed and made in violation of the injunction and thus must be vacated/reversed and set aside. The unified court is rewarding Burke/Siebert for their willful and contumacious violations of the injunction, for their collusion, tampering, perjury, suppression of evidence and bribery. Some hell of a courthouse. In fact it appears that this unified court system -based on the evidence- seems to be a cesspool of abuse of power, fraud, collusion, back-room cronyism and activities engaged in to undermine the rules of law and the us constitution in order to cover-up and protect the farcical and corruption- charades and follies of the bad-eggs who contaminate the entire legal system because of greed, larceny, malfeasance and corruption.
REMEMBER, CORRUPT COURTS CAN NOT FUNCTION WITHOUT CORRUPT LAWYERS AND CORRUPT LITIGANTS WHO NEED BACK-ROOM CRONYISM-FIXES. SEE SCAMRAIDERS FOR MORE EVIDENCE OF JOE BURKE, JOHN SIEBERT AND KEN GOMEZ'S LARCENY, EXTORTION, AMBUSHES AND TAMPERING/COLLUSION WITH THE UNIFIED COURTHOUSE AND SCHEMES TO ROB JIM AND OTHERS. RUSSO AND BURKE AND JOE BURKE WERE CHARGED WIT EXTORTING CREDITORS IN A SDNY FEDERAL CASE, YANNIV VS RUSSO AND BURKE AND JOE BURKE AND OTHERS.