JSC Paul Wooten has displayed a outrageous disdain for facts, the law, due process & the U.S. Constitution. Scamraiders & its agents have confirmed that Judge Wooten has favored defendants Dr.Siebert & his lawyer Joseph M. Burke in the Jim Couri case. Wooten has generated decisions dismissing Jim's motions on the grounds that Jim failed to obtain permission pursuant to a JSC Beeler 'injunction' of 12-12-05 which embraces not only Jim but all parties (ie Siebert & his pc) & Joseph M. Burke----JSC Wooten falled & refuses to dismiss all of Siebert/Burke motions that are improper & made without the mandated phone conference & pre-motion permission. The injunction mandated that any & all motions made in violation of it are improper & thus as a matter of law must be dismissed and set aside---including any motions previously decided by any judge who was not advised of the injunction.
Wooten targets Jim's motions & ignores Siebert/Burke's improper motions & improper decisions as a result thereof. Wooten then ignores Burke's spoliation, tampering with referee Jack Suter, & Siebert & Burke's perjury. Then JSC Wooten outright lies on a court telephonic conference on Sept. 1, 2010----falsely & atrociously claiming that the court tried to call Jim for months & the calls were ignored & not responded to by Jim. Such is a despicable sham & the court had no answer who, when, where these call were made----this was another wanton attempt to railroad Jim. The fact is Wooten simply concocted the sham accusation that Jim ignored the court's overtures for 'conference-calls'. In fact the record proves the contrary & that Jim called Wooten's court clerk Warren Rubio more than 10 times begging for conference calls & was rejected. We have these proofs.
Wooten, shooting from the hip simply LIED to cover up his rogue decisions & trickster actions. JSC Wooten we believe is on a intentional mission to rob Jim of documented money due to him from sex vulture & swindler Siebert---- & is willing to violate Jim's rights to due process & the U.S. Constitution--facts do not lie how a court can cherry-pick the law, injunctions, lie, manipulate the facts, demand compliance of illegal motions made by Siebert/Burke that were made in violation of the very injunction Wooten relies to dismiss Jim's motions is contemptible & exhibits more than wanton conduct by a judge. Jim has moved to recuse JSC Wooten. Based on Wooten's 'hit-man' conduct & documented lying JSC Wooten must answer to his acts. This is in addition to Wooten's abuse of Jim as to his well documented terminal cancer & other medical issues.
Wooten wishes to circumvent federal hipaa rules & regs, the injunction, & demand Jim complies with a decision of JSC Stallman generated in violation of the injunction as no permission was given fo the making of the motion----& allow Burke to lie as to Jim's compliance grounded on federal laws----this is not due process it is a railroading in living color by a bad-egg judge----Scamraiders will continue to investigate & report its findings pursuant to freedom of speech, press & the U.S. Constitution.